![]() Given that you are taking multiple shots of the same scene, the focus stacking technique works best in situations where there is minimal subject movement between shots. If a single shot cannot give you sufficient sharpness across the whole distance range, use focus stacking… provided that the subject matter allows for it. (OptimumCS-Pro can also be used with tilting lenses.) With appropriate subject matter, the use of tilts can give you extremely sharp images across a huge distance range. To obtain the sharpest possible single shot, use OptimumCS-Pro to determine the optimum camera settings.Īlso, consider using a lens that tilts. There is no need to use focus stacking if you can get with a single shot the image sharpness that you’re after. For the particular image sharpness standard that you specify, FocusStacker determines the minimum number of shots that you need to take, the distances to focus on, and the aperture to use.įocusStacker is designed for landscape and architectural photography (it is emphatically not suitable for macro photography). FocusStacker uses the optimization algorithm developed for the revolutionary OptimumCS-Pro app, but adapted to the taking of multiple shots. But what about the process of taking the shots? How many shots should you take? On what distances should you focus? And what is the best aperture to use? This is where FocusStacker comes in. The software for stacking photos is simple and easy to use. Import your shots into focus stacking software to create your final image (try Zerene Stacker, ).įocus stacking is a technique in which you take multiple shots of the same scene-each shot focused at a different distance-and then combine them in focus stacking software to create a sharp image over much greater depth than would be possible with a single shot.Set the aperture recommended by FocusStacker, and take a shot of the scene at each of FocusStacker’s recommended focus distances.Zerene gives the best final image by a large margin and the in camera stacking is noticeably better than Olympus Workspace. I have compared Zerene with Olympus Workspace and Olympus in camera stacking, by stacking the same bracketed images with all 3. Try them both to find out which interface you like the best and to decide if their output is worth the purchase price. ![]() You can try both programmes for free, as each offer a free 30 day trial. The personal edition of Zerene is currently $89USD for a lifetime licence and the lite version of Helicon is $115USD. The advantage of the Helicon approach is a simpler workflow.īoth programmes come in personal, enthusiast, and commercial variants with Zerene currently slightly cheaper in each version. ![]() The advantage of the Zerene approach is that it leaves raw conversion algorithms (and their updating) to the specialists. Zerene's philosophy is to let the user use an external raw editor (Lightroom, Capture One, etc.) to convert raw files to 16bit TIFF files which are then imported into Zerene to be stacked. One of the major differences in workflows is the way they handle raw files. Helicon has a more user friendly interface. The end results from either programme will be indistinguishable but their interfaces and workflow are different. Both do a very good job of stacking and offer the ability to edit the stacked images to correct any small stacking errors. There are two major specialist stacking programs, Zerene Stacker and Helicon Focus.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |